[Furta Sacra Thefts of Relics in the Central Middle Ages] EBOOK READ
Ed out Comprehending the motives of relic thieves can be puzzling for a modern audience particularly when it comes to understanding why their actions were not automatically condemned In this slim clearly written book Geary does a good job at unpicking the rationalisations which were in vogue during this period of the Middle Ages Relics particularly those which were the bodies of saints were alive in some way subjects and not objects therefore if they were stolen it could only be because the saint had personally sanctioned it To say otherwise was to deny the relic s mighty power The stolen relics were used to p The book that kicked my history senior thesis into motion I The book that kicked my history senior thesis into motion I spent many hours with it This work is about a narrow subject though the analysis is uite illuminating for Western European medieval culture as a whole Geary attempts to understand the background motives and patterns around the translationtheft of saints relics EVEN BETTER THE BOOK PROVIDES SOMETHING OF A PROLOGUE better the book provides something of a prologue relics themselves The study covers a hagiographic genre which could serve as a lesson for today s historiography
"andor journalism If ou want to learn how and why Santa Claus St Nicholas of Myra was stolen from his tomb "journalism If The Proposal you want to learn how and why Santa Claus St Nicholas of Myra was stolen from his tomb Anatolia and transported to a fledgling merchant town in Italy then read on An excellent examination of the history of relic veneration and theft Some sections on individual monasteries histories and arguments over document dating were predictably dry but the theft accounts and Geary s religious political historical and symbolic analyses of relics and their importance were really uite fascinating ifou re a nerd about this topic anyway which I am Clear brief and insightful account. For these acts asking how the relics were perceived and why the thefts met with the approval of medieval Christians. Ust for the narratives of what amounted to the ritual kidnapping of saints My favorite story of relic theft reuired decades of contrivance and biding of one particular monk s time Seriously Why The story of the theft effectively created a break with the past and with the community in which the relics had resided especially since it was believed that saints could not be carried off against their own wills Through a theft another community could forge ties saints could not be carried off against their own wills Through a theft another community could forge ties a particular saint This was such effective creative memory not to mention the power of such stories for capturing the imagination of potential pilgrims that theft stories were often invented even when relics had been acuired by licit means Fascinating thoughtful and accessible consideration of accounts of relics thefts and the interplay between society and relics Geary did a good job taking a measured look at the subject matter without giving into the anachronism and judgment Throughout the period between 800 and 1100 there developed a growing hagiographic tradition that claimed the translations of saints from one location to another by way of theft These strange accounts are the subject of Geary s project an examination that opens the way to further understanding of the power of relics and their role in medieval societyFor the most part the book has a specific range of time and texts with only the the introduction and chapter one describing the broad strokes of history surrounding them This is both a benefit and a detriment to the book On the one hand this attention allows for close study Geary looks at relic thefts in Western Europe between about 800 and 1100 seeking to categorise them but also to understand why they were carri. Ed the Roman catacombs In a revised edition of Furta Sacra Patrick Geary considers the social and cultural context. Pure joy Catholics will both laugh and cry Protestants will say I told ou so Patrick Geary was not rewarded and cry Protestants will say I told ou so Patrick Geary was not rewarded praise after this book first came out However it is a great book and fortunately has received respect since its first publication He shows how monks and the Christian Church knowingly stole relics and the reasons why they did it An interesting book on an eccentric topic the theft of relics during
"the Central Middle Ages in Europe and how these thefts were tolerated "Central Middle Ages in Europe and how these thefts were tolerated the Church After the Carolingian period the Church expanded to rural areas of Europe where Relics provided important spiritual protections from invasion that sparsely populated areas could not otherwise afford or count on Relics were also important sources of revenue for otherwise impoverished areas and could provide a draw for pilgrimageThe most interesting part of the book for me was Geary s distinction between the Byzantine Image and the Catholic Relic the former being a symbol for spiritual presence the latter being actual spiritual presence which was capable of miracles Thus the story of the translationes were incredibly important for establishing the legitimacy of an object s spiritual endowment something which would otherwise be incredibly difficult to prove How is the dust in the bag definitively that of this particular said Well let me tell ou a storyWhile some of the details of various translationes were a bit tedious for an amateur like me this of the details of various translationes were a bit tedious for an amateur like me this nevertheless a very interesting and accessible introduction to an otherwise obscure topic Found this while I was searching the shelves around here for something else and had to read it again The phenomenon itself is fascinating so it s worth a read To obtain sacred relics medieval monks plundered tombs avaricious merchants raided churches and relic mongers scour.